Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Khinda et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Amarjit Singh Khinda, Hardev Khinda and Texas Buffalo Wings, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv02104 |
| August 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| William B. Shubb |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
SECOND AMENDED STIPULATION of Dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint 19 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/13/2012 dismissing the action without prejudice against AMARJIT SINGH KHINDA AND HARDEV KHINDA, INDIVIDUALLY and d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WING S AND TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS, INC., an unknown business entity, d/b/a TEXAS BUFFALO WINGS. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by September 12, 2012, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
18
AMENDED 16 STIPULATION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 03/23/12. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/13/12 DISMISSING action without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that provided no party referenced has filed a motion to reopen this action by 2/5/12, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
