Beliso v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Chandra Beliso |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and T.D. Service Company |
| 2:2010cv02131 |
| August 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Fraud |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1461 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 26 Motion for leave to amend signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/28/11. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/27/2010 ORDERING that Pltf's 21 ex parte application for temporary restraining order and 23 amended complaint are STRICKEN. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/9/10 RECOMMENDING that Defts' 4 , 5 Motions to Dismiss be granted, Pltf's 13 Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order be denied, and this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days of service. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/30/10 ORDERING that the 10/7/10 and 10/21/10 hearings on the motions to dismiss are VACATED; dft T.D. Service Company's 4 Motion to Dismiss is SUBMITTED on the record; dft Wells Fargo's 5 Motion to Dismiss will be submitted on the record after the time has passed for pltf to file an opposition and the dft to file a reply. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
