Doug Duin v. Dale Elaine McCormick, et al
| Douglas C. Duin |
| John G. Steffes and Dale Elaine McCormick |
| 2:2010cv02150 |
| August 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/3/2012 ORDERING that Plaintiff filed a 63 "Notice of Settlement" on 4/6/2012, in which he states, "the above-referenced matter has been settled[; a] st ipulation and order of dismissal will be filed within the time frame set forth in Local Rule 160(b)." Therefore, a dispositional document shall be filed no later than 4/24/2012. Failure to respond by this deadline may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action without prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. See E.D. Cal. R. 160(b) ("A failure to file dispositional papers on the date prescribed by the Court may be grounds for sanctions."). Further, the trial scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 5/15/2012, shall remain on calendar in the event no dispositional document is filed, or if this action is not otherwise dismissed. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/21/12; The parties filed a Joint Pretrial Statement on February 20, 2012 (JPS), in which they request that this Court order that [related action Allstate Insurance Company v. John Steffes, et al., 2:1 1-cv- 00249] be tried first, to be followed by [this action] at a later date, which is mutually convenient to the court and counsel. (JPS, 2:14-17.) This request is denied.1 The parties also request in the JPS that [i]f the Court does not agree to ch ange the order of the trials... discovery be re-opened for the limited purpose of allowing previously disclosed experts to be deposed[; i]n this circumstance, the parties request an expert discovery deadline date of April 20, 2012. Id. at 5:9-12. Pur suant to the parties request, the depositions of expert witnesses previously disclosed shall be completed2 by April 20, 2012. Further, the parties shall file an Amended Joint Pretrial Statement no later than February 27, 2012, which shall address all applicable portions of Local Rule 281(b) and shall set forth each theory of liability (claim) and affirmative defense which remains to be tried, and the ultimate facts on which each theory/defense is based. The Amended Joint Pretrial Statement shall also address each partys estimated length of trial and how much time each party desires for voir dire, opening statements, and closing arguments. Lastly, the final pretrial conference scheduled for hearing on February 27, 2012, is continued until 1:30 p.m. on March 19, 2012.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/1/2011 ORDERING 34 The Estate has failed to demonstrate that it may not be named as a defendant under California Probate Code section 550 et seq.; therefore, the Estate's motion is DENIED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
45
[DISREGARD- DOCKETED IN ERROR. See 46 Clerks Notice] ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/8/11 ORDERING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is reset for 10/3/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Matson, R) Modified on 7/11/2011 (Donati, J).
|
|
Filing
41
RELATED CASE ORDER 39 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/20/2011. Action 2:11-CV-0249 GGH is REASSIGNED to Judge Burrell and Magistrate Edmund F. Brennan for all Further Proceedings. Henceforth, the caption on future documents shall be shown as 2:11-CV-0249 GEB EFB. Clerk shall make appropriate adjustment in assignment of action. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 30 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/24/11. Plaintiff has five days from the date on which this order is filed to file the proposed amended complaint which is attached as Exhibit 1 to his motion. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
