Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center et al v. United States Forest Service et al
| Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center, The Wilderness Society and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility |
| United States Forest Service, Susan Skalski and Randy Moore |
| 2:2010cv02172 |
| August 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/3/13 ORDERING Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on its claims that the Forest Service violated NEPA based on its analysis of alternatives and cumulative effects is denied and Def endants' and Defendant-Intervenors' motions for summary judgment on these claims are granted. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on its claim that the Forest Service violated the TMR is granted and Defendants' and De fendant-Intervenors' motions for summary judgment on this claim are denied. The parties are ordered to prepare additional briefing on the appropriate remedy for the Forest Service's violation of the TMR in preparation for a hearing set for February 15, 2012. The parties shall comply with the court's regular briefing schedule and limit the length of their briefs to ten pages each. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/1/12 re 56 Notice of Related Case. Although both cases concern challenges to the Forest Service's management of off-road vehicles and involve similar questions of law, the challenged actions a ffect different geographical areas and involve review of entirely separate administrative records. Thus, assigning both cases to the same judge would not result in a substantial savings of judicial effort. The court DECLINES to reassign Friends of Tahoe Forest Access under Local Rule 123(c). (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/25/12. The court directs counsel to be prepared to address the following questions during oral argument on the cross-motions to be held on Tuesday, 11/6/12 at 2:30 p.m. The parties may appear telephonically. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/31/2011 GRANTING 48 Motion to Shorten Time; Any brief in response to the material shall be filed no later than 6/3/2011. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/24/11 GRANTING 42 Stipulation; Federal defendants shall file their reply brief in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment on or before 5/26/11. Oral argument on all pending motions will be heard on 6/8/11. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/7/11 re 29 Stipulation and Proposed Order; Federal Defendants opening and opposition brief shall be filed on or before March 18, 2011, and Intervenors' opening and opposition brief shall be filed on or before March 25, 2011. Plaintiffs' opposition and reply brief shall be filed on or before April 27, 2011. The Federal Defendants' and Intervenors' reply briefs shall be filed on or before May 25,2011. The hearing date remains the same. Oral argument will be heard on June 8, 2011. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/7/11 ORDERING the Court GRANTS intervention to the California Association of Four Wheel Drive Clubs, Merced Dirt Riders, Modesto Houndsmen, District 36 Motorcycle Sports Committee, California Off Road V ehicle Association, and Blue Ribbon Coalition (Intervenors) as follows: Intervenors may participate in all phases of the litigation subject to the conditions included in Paragraphs 2 - 6; the briefing schedule set forth in the Courts November 2, 2010 Order 11 shall continue in effect. Intervenors shall file their opening and opposition brief on or before 3/18/11, and their reply brief on or before 5/20/11. Pltfs opposition and reply brief filed on 4/15/11 shall also address the arguments raise d in Intervenors brief; the Intervenors opening and opposition brief shall be no more than fifteen (15) pages. Intervenors reply brief shall be no more than five (5) pages. Intervenors agree to limit their brief to matters not addressed by Federal De fendants. The page limit for Plaintiffs opposition and reply brief shall be increased to forty (40) pages; Intervenors shall not seek discovery or seek to supplement the administrative record; Intervenors shall not independently seek to appeal any decision in this matter, but may appeal should the United States do so; each party shall bear its own costs and fees related to the participation of Intervenors in this matter. (Carlos, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
