Wright v. Dickinson
Patrick Wright |
Kathleen Dickinson |
2:2010cv02173 |
August 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/18/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/09/11 granting 10 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to petitioner filing an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus within 30 days. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner the court's form-application for writ of habeas corpus by state prisoners. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/20/11 vacating 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court will issue an order or amended findings and recommendations with respect to the motion to dismiss shortly. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/11/2011 RECOMMENDING that respondent's 10 motion to dismiss be granted; and this case be closed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/14/11 ORDERING that 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are VACATED; 14 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; and petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file his opposition or statement of non-opposition to respondents motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 13 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/01/11 recommending that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b). MOTION to DISMISS 10 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/11 ORDERING that petitioner file an opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss within thirty days or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/30/2010 ORDERING ptnr to submit, w/in 30 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; and the clerk to send ptnr an ifp form.(Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wright v. Dickinson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Patrick Wright | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Kathleen Dickinson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.