Johnson v. Varakin et al
Scott N. Johnson |
Walter A. Varakin and Genevieve A. Varakin |
2:2010cv02175 |
August 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Kendall J. Newman |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/1/2011 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1); each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/25/2011 ORDERING 17 that the dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed no later than 20 days from the effective date of this order. All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby VACATED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/1/10, ORDERING this matter REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. The status conference currently set for 12/6/10 is hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/20/2010 GRANTING 7 Plaintiffs Request to Continue; Status Conference reset for 12/6/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Status reports shall be filed 14 days prior to the status conference. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.