McCune v. Singh
| Michael McCune |
| Satnam Singh |
| 2:2010cv02207 |
| August 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/3/2013 ORDERING 59 Defendant fails to show that he is entitled to relief from the grant of summary judgment and the award of attorneys' fees in this case. For this reason, his motion is DENIED; Monetar y Sanctions In the Court's 4/15/2013 minute order, Defendant's counsel Robert McCann was ORDERED to show cause for failing to oppose Plaintiff's motion for fees as required by Local Rule 230(c) or pay sanctions in the amount of $1 50 within 10 days. Mr. McCann did not respond directly to the Court's minute order, and insofar as the motion to set aside constitutes a response it is insufficient for the reasons discussed in the preceding section. The motion was also filed pa st the Court's 10 day deadline. The Court accordingly finds that Mr. McCann has not shown good cause for failing to oppose Plaintiff's fees motion, and he is therefore ORDERED to pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $150.00 to the Clerk of Court within 10 days.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
58
AMENDED JUDGMENT re 51 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/19/13 ORDERING judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff Michael McCune and against Defendant Satnam Singh in the total amount of $55,177.73. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/18/12: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on his ADA, Unruh Act, and CDPA claims is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $16,000 in statutory damages pursuant to the Unruh Act 's statutory damages provision. Defendant's Counsel, Morton B. Holt, Jr., is ordered to either (1) submit a statement of good cause for failing to comply with the local rules or (2) pay sanctions of $150.00 to the Clerk of Court. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/26/12 ORDERING that Defendant's motion to set aside entry of default, filed December 23, 2011, 29 , is granted, and that Singh's answer, filed as an attachment to the motion on Decem ber 23, 2011, is deemed properly filed; Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, filed December 20, 2011, is vacated from the calendar for February 9, 2012; and Both parties now appearing by counsel, the referral to the magistrate judge is withdrawn. However, the magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20). (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/3/12 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendant's MOTION to SET ASIDE DEFAULT 29 is CONTINUED to 1/26/2012. Defendant's MOTION is construed as one brought pursuant to FRCP 55(c). (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/17/2011 ORDERING that within twenty-eight days of this order, plaintiff shall move for entry of default against defendant, and proceed with the filing of a default judgment motion within twenty-eight days after default has been entered by the Clerk. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/16/2011 ORDERING that Dft shall SHOW CAUSE, within 14 days, why an answer has not been filed, or he shall file an answer. Failure to comply with this order will result in sanctions, including the possibility of default. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/27/11 ORDERING that the June 2, 2011 hearing on the 17 motion to amend, filed April 28, 2011, is VACATED. The motion is submitted on the record.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/03/11 ORDERING that, w/i 30 days, the parties shall confer in person about the automatic disclosures required by FRCP 26. Thereafter, w/i 14 days, the parties shall submit a joint status report as outlined. Upon reviewing the joint status report, the Court may issue a scheduling order or set a status conference. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 01/04/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/28/10 12 are ADOPTED; Defendant's MOTION to STAY and Request for early evaluation conference, filed 9/30/10 10 is DENIED. Defendant shall file an answer within 28 days of the filed date of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/26/2010 recommending that Defendant's 10 Motion to stay and request for early evaluation conference, filed September 30, 2010, be denied. Defendant file an answer w/in 28 days of an order adopting these findings and recommendations. Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/21/10 DENYING deft's 6 Motion for Stay and Early Evaluation Conference without prejudice. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCune v. Singh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael McCune | |
| Represented By: | Lynn Hubbard, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Satnam Singh | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
