DuRoss v. California State Prison-Warden et al
| Mark Anthony DuRoss |
| California State Prison-Warden, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwarzenegger and John Chiang |
| 2:2010cv02225 |
| August 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/2011 DENYING pltf's 29 motion. Any documents filed by ptf from this date forward will be disregarded; no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/1/11 GRANTING 26 Motion to Proceed IFP on appeal. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/28/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 22 motion to vacate is DENIED w/out prejudice; pltf's 24 motion to proceed IFP is denied w/out prejudice; the clerk to send pltf a new ifp application; and pltf to submit w/in 30 days, a completed affidavit to proceed ifp and a certified trust acct statement. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/10/10 ORDERING that plaintiffs 8 motion is denied without prejudice; 10 motion for default judgment is denied; Clerk of Court is directed to randomly draw a district judge. It is RECOMMENDED that that this action be referred to the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/24/2010. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend w/in 30 days from date of this Order. Clerk directed to send plaintiff forms for filing Prisoner Civil Right and an Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Defendants' 1 Request for Extension of Time is DENIED and they are RELIEVED from their obligation to file a responsive pleading until Court so directs. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
