Esoimeme v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Plaintiff: Mathias Esoimeme
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, NDEX West, LLC and World Savings Bank
Case Number: 2:2010cv02259
Filed: August 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/21/12 RECOMMENDING that defendants' 39 Motion to Dismiss the second amended complaint be granted and the defendants' 38 Motion to Dismiss be denied as moot; that the plaintiff's 43 Request for the court to rule in his favor be denied and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Motions referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C)
May 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/25/2012 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing as to 38 , 39 Motions to Dismiss to 7/11/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; ORDERING Plaintiff to SHOW CAU SE, in writing, by 6/20/2012, as to why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file a timely Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 38 , 39 Motions to Dismiss; ORDERING Plaintiff to file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 38 , 39 Motions to Dismiss by 6/20/2012, Defendant's Reply, if any, due by 6/27/2012. (Michel, G)
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2012 STRIKING 31 Opposition. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint due by 3/16/2012. Response to Amended Complaint due 14 days from the date an amended complaint is filed. (Michel, G)
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/18/2012 GRANTING 29 Motion for Extension of Time. Amended Complaint due by 2/17/2012. Response due 14 days from the date the Amended Complaint is filed. (Michel, G)
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/10/2011 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 are ADOPTED; Wells Fargo's # 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Wells Fargo's # 8 Motion to Strike is DENIED; Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety; Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. (Reader, L)
September 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/1/2011 ORDERING that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference SET for 12/21/2011 is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that 7 Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Wells Fargo Bank be granted; that 8 Motion to Strike portions of plaintiff's Complaint filed by Wells Fargo Bank be denied; that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in its entirety; that plaintiff be granted 30 days from the date of service of a ny order adopting these findings and recommendations to file an amended complaint; that plaintiff be admonished that, in any amended complaint, plaintiff must plead against which defendants he brings each cause of action and what each defendant did t o support relief under each respective cause of action; that plaintiff be warned that failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in recommendation that this action be dismissed. Any party may file objections to these findings and recommendations w/i 14 days after being served.(Waggoner, D)
November 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/02/10 ORDERING that plf's 15 Motion to Remand is DENIED; the hearing on dfts' 7 Motion to Dismiss Complaint and 8 Motion to Strike is CONTINUED to 12/22/ 10 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; plf shall SHOW CAUSE by 12/08/10 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motions and for failure to timely respond to the 09/28/10 order; plf shall file an opposition to the motions, or a statement of non-opposition by 12/08/10; dfts may file a reply to plf's opposition(s) by 12/15/10. (Benson, A.)
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/28/2010. Defendants' 7 Motions to Dismiss Complaint and 8 to Strike Hearings are CONTINUED to for 11/10/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB). Plaintiff shall S HOW CAUSE, in writing, no later thatn 10/27/2010 why sanction should not be imposed for failure to timely file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to pending Motions. Plaintiffs shall file and Opposition / Statement of Non-Opposition no later than 10/27/2010. Defendants may file a Reply to plaintiff's Opposition(s), if any, on or before 11/3/2010. (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Esoimeme v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mathias Esoimeme
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank
Represented By: Matthew J. Pero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NDEX West, LLC
Represented By: Matthew J. Pero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: World Savings Bank
Represented By: Matthew J. Pero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?