Bailey v. Fairfield Police Department, et al
Plaintiff: Lee James Bailey
Defendant: Fairfield Police Department, Pucci and Jacobsen
Case Number: 2:2010cv02295
Filed: August 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/01/11 recommending that that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b). MOTION to DISMISS 22 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 AMENDED ORDER TAXING COSTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/14/11 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order, defendant Jacobsen shall pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $153.86, unless within that time d efendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to timely waive service. The court does not intend to extend this fourteen-day period. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. (cc USM)(Dillon, M)
November 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER and ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/2/11ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Lee James Bailey to the clerk until the balance of  6;350 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. Clerk of Court is direct ed to serve on plaintiff, at his current address, a copy of this courts order 27 ; plaintiff is informed that failure to timely respond to that order, and to file an opposition to defendants pending motion to dismiss, shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Clerk of Court is directed to update plaintiffs address to Lee James Bailey (CDCR # AK0711), Deuel Vocational Institution, P.O. Box 600, Tracy, CA 95378-0600. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
October 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/19/2011 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, pltf shall file an opposition, if any, to the pending 22 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
August 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 14 Motion for More Definite Statement signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/24/11; Defendants shall timely file a pleading that is responsive to plaintiff's original complaint. (Matson, R)
August 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/24/11 ORDERING within 14 days from the date of this order, defendant Jacobsen shall pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $81.52, unless within that time defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to timely waive service. The court does not intend to extend this fourteen-day period. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal.(Matson, R)
June 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/21/11 ORDERING that, within thirty days after the filing date of this order, Plaintiff shall file an opposition, to the pending Motion for more definite statement. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the pending (a) Motion granted; (b) Action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and/or (c) Action dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with these rules and a court order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Lee James Bailey signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/18/2011; Sheriff of Solano County is directed to collect the initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accoradance with this order; Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Sheriff of Solano County and the court's financial unit.(Waggoner, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Fairfield Police Department, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fairfield Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacobsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee James Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?