Grimes v. Folsom State Prisons Psychiatric Services Units et al
Plaintiff: Randall W Grimes
Defendant: Folsom State Prisons Psychiatric Services Units, M. Bobballa, Joyce, K. Morgan, T. Virga, Deborah Lacy and Shearer
Case Number: 2:2010cv02346
Filed: August 31, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/15/13 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/31/2013 ORDERING that, within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motions to dismiss and to revoke his IFP 58 , 59 . (Yin, K)
April 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER denying 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/23/13. (Plummer, M)
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/13/12 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
March 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/23/12 ORDERING that plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to file a third amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
October 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 09/30/11 ordering plaintiff's 09/09/11 motion is construed as a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, and so construed 32 is granted. Plaintiff's first amended complaint is dismissed. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached notice of amendment and submit it along with an original and 1 copy of the complaint. Plaintiff's 04/26/11 motion 27 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's 08/18/11 motion for default judgment 30 is denied. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff the court's form for a prisoner civil rights complaint and accompanying instructions. (Plummer, M)
March 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/25/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 3/3/11 Request for voluntary dismissal of defendants Virga, Morgan and Boballa is GRANTED. Defendants Virga, Morgan and Boballa are DISMISSED from this action. The Court's 2/23/11 22 Order Directing Service by USM is VACATED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. Within thirty days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Amendment. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica N. Anderson, 1300 I Street, Suite 125, P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento CA 9424-2550. (cc: USM) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/10/11 ORDERING that the 18 findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2011, are adopted in full. Plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief contained in his complaint is denied with r espect to his complaints concerning his shoulder and right hip; with respect to his request for preliminary injunctive relief with respect to adequate treatment for his left hip, plaintiffs request for is denied without prejudice to its renewal, as appropriate, at a later stage of these proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica N. Anderson.(Duong, D)
January 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/13/11 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to serve a copy of these findings and recommendations on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica N. Anderson; It is REC OMMENDED that plaintiffs request for preliminary injunctive relief contained in his complaint be denied with respect to his complaints concerning his shoulder and his right hip and denied without prejudice with respect to his request for adequate treatment for his left hip. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (cc Monica Anderson) (Dillon, M)
November 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/18/10ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Randall W. Grimes to the clerk until the balance of $350 is pa id in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grimes v. Folsom State Prisons Psychiatric Services Units et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randall W Grimes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Folsom State Prisons Psychiatric Services Units
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Bobballa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joyce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deborah Lacy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shearer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?