Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Gregory Bell |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2010cv02529 |
| September 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/6/12; On October 21, 2011, this court ordered that defendant's motion to dismiss would be granted on the condition that the Commissioner file proof that it had sent plaintiff its promised underpayment. That order outlined the basis for granting the motion to dismiss. (Dkt. no. 24.) The Commissioner has now filed proof that it processed an underpayment in the amount of $4,439.66 to plaintiff's bank account. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in this courts order filed October 21, 2011, IT IS ORDERED that: Defendant's motion to dismiss, filed May 31, 2011 (dkt. no. 14), is granted. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/20/11; However, the case will not be ordered dismissed until the Commissioner files proof in this court that he has sent the promised underpayment to plaintiff. The Commissioner shall file such proof within 90 days of the filed date of this order. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/14/2011 ORDERING that a hearing on Dft's 14 Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for 10/6/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. Dft shall be prepared to address the origin of Pltf's claim that Dft has been deducting ten percent from his monthly benefit payments from 2005 to the present. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/13/10 ORDERING that Pltf's 5 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. Clerk directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. Pltf to submit service documents within 15 days of the date of the filing of this order. USM directed to serve process within 60 days of this order. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/28/2010. Plaintiff shall submit, w/in 28 days from date of this Orer, either a completed and signed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on form provided or the appropriate filing fee and a signed Complaint. Clerk directed to send plaintiff a new Application. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregory Bell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
