Smith v. C.D.C.
Kenneth A. Smith |
C.D.C., Williams and Zaka |
2:2010cv02561 |
September 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/23/2011 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K) |
Filing 9 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/11 ORDERING that within twenty-one days of the date of this order plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with the December 9, 2010 order. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/8/2010 ORDERING Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 7) isgranted. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Amendment and submit to the court.(Matson, R) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/7/10 denying 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a properly completed application; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a form for an application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.