Smith v. Sacramento Sheriff, et al
| Kenneth A. Smith |
| Sacramento Sheriff, Department of Corrections and Courthouse Bailiff Division |
| 2:2010cv02563 |
| September 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/08/11 recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/11/11 ORDERING that plf's 9 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; the 8 Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with one more opportunity to amend. Plf's amended complaint shall be filed w/i 30 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/7/10: Plaintiff shall submit, within twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this order, either a completed application and affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted twenty-eight (28) days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a non-prisoner. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
