Johnson et al v. Bank United FSB et al
| Carolina Johnson and Claude Colwell |
| Bank United FSB, BankUnited and Freestand Financial |
| 2:2010cv02567 |
| September 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| El Dorado |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 05/22/12 ORDERING that defendant's 36 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and plaintiff's deceit, fraud, and constructive fraud claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/7/11 ORDERING 15 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and its motion for a more definite statement is DENIED. Plaintiffs are granted fourteen (14) days from the date on which thi s order is filed to file a Second Amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies of any claim dismissed without prejudice. Further, Plaintiffs are notified that any dismissed claim may be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) if Plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint within the prescribed time period. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/9/11 ORDERING the Order of Dismissal 18 is VACATED; pltfs have 60 days to serve dfts Freestand Financial and Bank United FSB; and the Status Conference is CONTINUTED to 9/19/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr..(Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/5/11 re 25 ORDERING that since this filing does not comply with Local Rule 220, it is STRICKEN. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/15/11 ORDERING that Plaintiffs failed to respond to the 16 March 8th Order by this deadline. Therefore, Defendants Bank United F.S.B. and Freestand Financial are dismissed from this action without prejudice.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/7/11 ORDERING Plaintiffs shall either file whatever documents are required to prosecute this case as a default matter no later than 4:00 p.m. on April 25, 2011, or Show Cause in a writing filed no lat er than 4:00 p.m. on April 25, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed against Defendants Bank United F.S.B. and Freestand Financial for failure of prosecution. If a hearing is requested on the Show Cause issue concerning whether this case shou ld be dismissed for failure of prosecution, it will be held on May 9, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. Lastly, the status conference scheduled for March 14, 2011, is continued to commence at 9:00 a.m. on May 9, 2011. A status report shall be filed 14 days prior to the status conference in which Plaintiffs are required to explain the status of the default proceedings.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/8/2011 ORDERING Pltf's to SHOW CAUSE, no later than 4:00 PM on 2/28/2011, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file a timely status report. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on 3/14/2011, at 9:00 AM, just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that date and time. A status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to the status conference. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/16/2010 ORDERING that Defendant's 4 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Since all claims alleged against Defendant are dismissed, Defendant's motion for a more definite statement is DENIED as m oot. Plaintiffs are granted fourteen (14) days from the date on which this order is filed to file a First Amended Complaint. This action may be dismissed with prejudice against the movant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) if Plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint within the prescribed time period. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE and Continuing hearing on Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/10/10. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the Motion as required by Local Rule 230(c). Plaintiffs and their counsel are ORDERED to Show Cause in a filed response to this OSC on or before 12/6/2010, in which they explain why sanctions should not be issued because of Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending Motion. The hearing on MOTION to DISMISS 4 is RESCHEDULED to 12/20/2010 at 09:00 AM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
