Gonzales v. INDYMAC BANK FSB, et al
| Marlene Gonzales |
| US Bank National Association, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., First American Title Co., A & B Lending and INDYMAC BANK FSB |
| 2:2010cv02634 |
| September 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| All Other Real Property |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/24/11 RECOMMENDING that the 12 , 16 Motions to Dismiss be granted as unopposed; this action be dismissed as to dfts Indymac Bank FSB and A&B Lending ; plf's claims against all dfts be dismissed w/ prejudice and case be closed. Objections to these F&Rs due w/i 14 days; referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/15/11 ORDERING Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than May 13, 2011, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file timely opposition or a statement of non-oppos ition to defendants' motions and for failure to appear at properly noticed hearings; Plaintiff's response to this order must be filed with the court and served on defendants' attorneys of record concurrently with a separate opposition or statement of nonopposition to each motion to dismiss; opposition must address all arguments presented in any motion that is opposed; Defendants' replies, if any, to opposition filed by plaintiff pursuant to this order shall be filed and serve d no later than May 27, 2011; and Plaintiff's failure to file a written response to this order concurrently with opposition or a statement of non-opposition to each motion will be deemed a statement of nonopposition to the granting of the motions and will constitute grounds for imposing appropriate sanctions, including dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/24/11 ORDERING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 2/11/11, at 11:00 a.m. before the undersigned is vacated as premature. Plaintiff is relieved of the obligation to file and serve a status report on or before 1/28/11, and all defendants are relieved of the obligation to file and serve a status report on or before 2/4/11. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/11/10: Scheduling Conference set for 2/11/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before January 28, 2011, and defendants shall file and serve a status report or reports on or before February 4, 2011. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
