Salgado v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al
| Edmundo Salgado |
| Wells Fargo Bank, Alliance Title Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. |
| 2:2010cv02660 |
| September 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/17/11 ORDERING that the 3/23/11 motion hearing and the 5/25/11 status conference are VACATED; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b); that the 5 Motion to Dismiss be denied as moot and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Motion referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/7/2011. Well Fargo's 5 Motion to Dismiss Hearing is CONTINUED to 3/23/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB). Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 3/9/2011 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to pending Motion. Plaintiff shall file responsive pleading to Motion no later than 3/9/2011. Wells Fargo may file a Reply to plaintiff's Opposition, if any, on or before 3/16/2011. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
