Langston v. Enkoji et al
Walter Shane Langston |
Ryan Enkoji, Jeffrey Shiraishi, Matt Hoffman, Rick Braziel, Jeff Watson, Stephen Choe and Authro Reyes |
2:2010cv02715 |
October 6, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Kings |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/31/2011 DENYING pltf's 13 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K) |
Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Walter Shane Langston signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/3/2011. CDC is to collect monthly payments and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/20/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within 28 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.