Traverse et al v. Hoang et al
Plaintiff: Yvonne Traverse and Richard Traverse
Defendant: Nam Hoang, Chapa De Indian Health Program Inc and United States of America
Case Number: 2:2010cv02816
Filed: October 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/29/2010 ORDERING that The 8 November 23, 2010 order to show cause is DISCHARGED. The hearing date of January 5, 2011 on defendants 5 8 motion to dismiss is VACATED. The 2 status (pret rial scheduling) conference currently set for hearing on February 23, 2011 is VACATED. It is further RECOMMENDED that Defendants' 5 motion to dismiss be granted. This action be dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiffs' failure to exhaust their administrative remedies and The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Objections due within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Duong, D)
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/23/10: HEARING as to 5 MOTION to DISMISS RESET for 1/5/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiffs shall show cause, i n writing, no later than December 22, 2010, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion. Plaintiffs shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than December 22, 2010. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Traverse et al v. Hoang et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yvonne Traverse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Traverse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nam Hoang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chapa De Indian Health Program Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Edward A Olsen, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?