Stein v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.,
Plaintiff: Maria Christina Stein
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.
Case Number: 2:2010cv02827
Filed: October 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Stanislaus
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 JUDGMENT dated *2/21/13* in favor of defendants pursuant to order signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/19/12. (Becknal, R)
December 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/18/12 ORDERING since the balance of the factors strongly favors dismissal of this action with prejudice, this action is dismissed with prejudice and judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendan ts. Further, in light of Richard C. Sinclairs (SBN 068238) failure to pay the nine hundred dollars ($900.00) in monetary sanctions and repeated failure to respond to the Courts orders, the Clerk of the Court shall forward a copy of this order al ong with copies of docket entries Nos. 56, 59, 61-64 to the following address, so that the California State Bar has information which can be used in its determination whether disciplinary action is appropriate: Office of Chief Trial Counsel The State Bar of California 1149 South Hill Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-2299. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (cc Office of Chief Trial Counsel) (Matson, R)
December 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL STATMENT and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/11/12. Richard C. Sinclair, Esq. is sanctioned $700.00, in addition to the November 21st $200.00 sanction, equaling  6;900.00 to be paid to the Clerk of this Court no later than 4:00 p.m. on 12/14/12. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than 12/14/12 why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for repeated failure to comply with the Rules and this Court's orders. The Final Pretrial Conference remains on the calendar for 1/14/13. A joint final retrial statement shall be filed no later than 7 days prior to conference. (Manzer, C)
December 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/4/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause ("OSC") in a writing to be filed no later than 12/7/12, why she and/or her couns el should not be sanctioned five hundred dollars ($500.00) for failure to file a timely final pretrial statement and an additional two hundred dollars ($200.00) for failing to timely pay the original 11/21/12 monetary sanction. The writte n response shall state whether Plaintiff or her counsel is at fault, and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on 1/14/13, at 1:30 p.m., just prior to the final pretrial conference, which is reset to that date and time. A joint final pretrial statement shall be filed no later than seven (7) days prior to the final pretrial conference. The parties shall give themselves adequate time to meet and confer in advance of this filing date to timely pre pare and file a joint statement. Plaintiff is warned that the continued failure to comply with the Rules and/or this Court's orders could result in this action being dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(b) and judgment entered in favor of Defendants. (Becknal, R)
November 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/20/2012 DENYING 57 Motion to Extend the discovery completion.(Donati, J)
November 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/14/2012 ORDERING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than 11/19/2012, why sanctions should not be imposed against her and/or counsel under Rule 16(f) and the Federal Rules of P rocedure for failure to file a timely final pretrial statement. The response shall also state whether Plaintiff or her counsel is at fault, and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on 12/10/2012, just prior to the Final Pretrial Conference, which is RESCHEDULED to 12/10/2012 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Krueger, M)
August 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/1/2011 re 38 ORDERING that Defendants 38 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted fourteen (14) days from the date on which this order is filed to file a Third Amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies in the dismissed claims. Further, Plaintiff is notified that any dismissed claim not amended within this prescribed time period may be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Duong, D)
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 5/18/11. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference set for 5/23/11 is hereby VACATED. All discovery is DUE by 10/11/11. Designation of Expert Witnesses is DUE by 5/20/1 1 and any rebuttal expert disclosure is DUE by 7/13/11. The last hearing date for motions shall be 12/21/11, at 9:00 a.m. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 2/27/2012 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Trial is SET for 5/29/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
April 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/11/2011. Court's 32 Scheduling Order is hereby VACATED and plaintiff's 25 Motion to Amend 21 First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff has 5 days from filed date of this Order in which to file a Proposed Second Amended Complaint. Further Status Conference is SET for 5/23/2011 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to Hearing. (Marciel, M)
March 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/7/2011 ORDERING Show Cause Response due no later than 4:00 PM on 3/28/2011; Initial Scheduling Conference reset for 4/11/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr; A status report shall be filed nolater than 14 days prior to the status conference. (Reader, L)
February 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Dfts' Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 2/22/11. Pltf is GRANTED 14 days from the date on which this order is filed to file a First Amended Complaint.(Kastilahn, A)
December 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/2/2010. Due to plaintiff's total disability for a 60-day duration, defendants' 10 Motion to Dismiss Hearing is now CONTINUED to 2/7/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stein v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Christina Stein
Represented By: Richard C. Sinclair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Benjamin D. Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin D. Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?