Center for Biological Diversity v. Crawley, et al
| Center for Biological Diversity |
| Mike Crawley and United States Forest Service |
| 2:2010cv02830 |
| October 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| William B. Shubb |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/26/2011 ORDERING 39 The Pretrial Conference date of 10/17/2011 and the Court Trial date of 1/10/2012 are HEREBY VACATED. A Status Conference is set for 11/14/2011 at 2:00 p.m. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 10/31/2011. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/2/2011 ORDERING that the case be STAYED until 9/26/2011. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/10/11: Plaintiff's motion to augment the record due July 1, 2011; Defendants' responsive brief regarding record augmentation due July 15, 2011; Plaintiff's reply due July 22, 2011. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/27/11 re 29 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion to augment the record will be due June 15, 2011. Defendants' responsive brief regarding record augmentation will be due June 30, 2011. Plaintiff's reply will be due July 8, 2011.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/8/11 ORDERING that the Motion to intervene 25 is DENIED. Upon Application, the court will consider a Request by the proposed intervenors to file Amicus Curie Briefs in response to any Motions filed in this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/26/10. The court is in receipt of the Notice of Related Cases concerning the above-captioned cases filed October 20, 2010. The court has determined that it is inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. This order is issued for informational purposes only, and shall have no effect on the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of this court.(Williams, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
