Walker v. McDonald et al
| Douglas Walker |
| Mike McDonald, - Buchanan, - Stevens, Miranda, J. Walker, T. Robertson, D. Clark, D. Frazier, Lex Simpson, - Garbutt and Chelsey Davies |
| 2:2010cv02835 |
| October 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/10/11 ORDERING the clerk to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that defendants' 19 motion to dismiss be granted; and this case be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Assigned and Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Douglas Walker signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/17/11. Payments shall be collected monthly until a total of $350.00 has been paid in full. (cc: Financial and CDCR) (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/29/2010 ORDERING pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a completed affidavit to proceed ifp; the clerk to send pltf a new ifp application; and pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a certified copy of his trust acct statement. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
