Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
Larry Clark |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2010cv02863 |
October 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/7/12; IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, the Commissioner's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and judgment is entered for the Commissioner.(Matson, R) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time to Submit Defendant's Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment by Commissioner of Social Security 25 signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/22/11. (Matson, R) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/14/2011 re: 23 Stipulation and Proposed Order; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for defendant to respond to plaintiff's opening brief is EXTENDED to 12/19/2011. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/18/11 ORDERING Plaintiff to file a summary judgment motion within 14 days of this order. Failure to file the motion will result in dismissal of this action. There will be NO extensions granted. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/28/11: Plaintiff's time to file his summary judgment is hereby extended from September 27, 2011, to October 6, 2011. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/1/2011 ORDERING that Pltfs time to file his summary judgment is EXTENDED to 9/27/2011. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/15/2011 ORDERING 15 that Plaintiff's time to file his summary judgment is hereby EXTENDED from 7/11/2011, to 8/25/2011. (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/3/2010 GRANTING plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Clerk directed to serve Judge Hollows' Scheduling Order in Social Security cases. Within 15 days from this Order& #039;s date, plaintiff shall submit to US Marshal an original and 5 copies of completed Summons, 5 copies of Complaint, 5 copies of Scheduling Order, and a completed USM-285 form for service. Plaintiff is also to provide a Statement to the Court that said documents have been sent. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Larry Clark | |
Represented By: | Bess M. Brewer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.