Matute v. Chevy Chase F.S.B. et al
| Marson Matute |
| Chevy Chase F.S.B., Capital One N.A., B.F. Sual Mortgage Company, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation and New Century Title Company |
| 2:2010cv02932 |
| October 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/3/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's TILA damages claim is DISMISSED with prejudice, and Plaintiff's remaining state claims are REMANDED to the Superior Court of California in the County of Sacramento, from which this case was removed. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's TILA damages claim. CASE CLOSED. (cc: certified copy sent to Sacramento County Superior Court) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
11
FEDERAL RULE of CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(M) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/23/2011. Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) that defendants Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation and New Century Title Company may be dismissed unless plaintiff provides Proof of Service or shows good cause for failure to serve defendants w/in Rule's 120-day prescribed period in a filing due no later than 4:00 p.m. on 3/2/2011. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
