Cordoba v. California Medical Facility et al
Plaintiff: William Cordoba
Defendant: California Medical Facility and Kathleen L Dickinson
Case Number: 2:2010cv02944
Filed: November 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/17/12 ORDERING that Defendants objections 38 are overruled; Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time 40 is denied as unnecessary and moot; and the Clerk of th e Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants motion for summary judgment 35 be granted; and this action be closed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
April 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/04/12. (Plummer, M)
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/12/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 31 motion to compel. (Yin, K)
October 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying 20 Motion for entry of default signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/05/11. (Plummer, M)
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/28/2011 GRANTING 27 Defendants' motion for leave to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference; and nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring any state penal institution to obtain video-conferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Reader, L)
April 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/2011 ORDERING that pltf's cmplt is DISMISSED; pltf has 30 days to file an amended cmplt; and the clerk to send pltf the form for filing a civil rights action.(Yin, K)
November 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of CA (Sacramento), FORTWITH. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 11/01/10 ***Civil Case Terminated. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010) Modified on 11/2/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 11/2/2010.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cordoba v. California Medical Facility et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Cordoba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Medical Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen L Dickinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?