Robinson v. Plumas County
| Joseph Robinson |
| Plumas County |
| 2:2010cv02948 |
| November 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER with FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/2/2011. Defendant's 9 10 Requests for Judicial Notice are GRANTED; and RECOMMENDING that defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint be granted, 10 Motion to Declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant be denied without prejudice, Complaint be dismissed with prejudice, and action be closed. Within 14 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file and serve written Objections with Court. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/16/11 DENYING 31 and 32 Motions for Ruling. The matters will not appear on the court's 6/17/11 calendar. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 23 Motion to recuse signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/17/11. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/23/2010 DENYING 18 Request for issuance of subpoenas and any party or non-party who is served with a subpoena for the hearing in this matter on 1/21/2011, will not be required to comply with the subpoena, since testimony will not be taken and documentary evidence will not be accepted at the hearing. Plaintiff's 20 Motion for Permanent Injunction is DENIED as premature and for failure to comply with Local Rule 231, and the motion will not be placed on the court's 1/21/2011 law and motion calendar. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/13/10 DENYING without prejudice 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the motion is dropped from the courts December 17, 2010 law and motion calendar ; DENYING as moot 11 Ex Parte Application for Order ; Defendants motion to quash subpoena duces tecum shall be re-filed as a separate motion and shall be noticed for hearing in accordance with the Local Rules. (Williams, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Plumas County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Robinson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Plumas County | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
