Wallace v Cullen et al
| Richard D. Wallace |
| Vincent S. Cullen, Bruce Jones, Michael Amaro and Newman |
| 2:2010cv02963 |
| November 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Marin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/12/12 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/27/11 ORDERING that the amended complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to file an amended complaint. Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a form for filing a civil rights action. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/23/11 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Richard D. Wallace to the clerk until the balance of $350 i s paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
