Hairston v. Harrington
Petitioner: Anthony Jerome Hairston
Respondent: K. Harrington
Case Number: 2:2010cv03056
Filed: November 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 1/18/12: Ordering that petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. Recommending that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. F&R referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within twenty-one days. (Kaminski, H)
November 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Due to the appointment of Recalled Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer to the bench of the Eastern District, this action is REASSIGNED from Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman to Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer for all further proceedings. The District Judge currently assigned to the case will remain unchanged. (Donati, J)
July 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/19/11 ORDERING that petitioners motion for law library access 24 and motion for extension of time 25 are DENIED as unnecessary. (Dillon, M)
June 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/09/11 ordering motion for law library access 21 is denied without prejudice. Petitioner's motion for extension of time 22 is granted. Petitioner's reply to respondent's answer is due within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
March 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/16/11 ORDERING Petitioners January 24, 2011 motion to stay (Dkt. No. 11) and the February 23,2011 findings and recommendations (Dkt. No. 13) are vacated; Petitioner's March 7, 2011 motion l ift the stay (Dkt. No. 14) is granted; Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. An answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition. If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within twenty-eight days after service of the answer; If the response to the habeas petition is a mo tion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within twenty-eight days after service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fourteen days thereafter; and the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, the consent/ reassignment form, and a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. (Matson, R)
February 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/22/2011 RECOMMENIDNG that ptnr's 11 motion to stay this action be granted; and ptnr be ordered to request the stay be lifted w/in 21 days of the order filed in CA Supreme Court addressing his pending habeas petition. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
January 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/30/10 granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Stay. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a renewed motion to stay.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hairston v. Harrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Jerome Hairston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: K. Harrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?