Cook v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Leah Cook |
Union Pacific Railroad Company, CUSA ES LLC and CUSA CSS LLC |
2:2010cv03091 |
November 16, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
John A. Mendez |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/14/2012. Court acknowledges receipt of 20 Notice of Settlement and plaintiff shall file documents disposing of action within 21 days of Order. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/16/2011 ORDERING that Dft Union Pacific Railroad Company's 16 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice. It is further ordered that, within 10 days, Nilesh Choudhary shall either pay sanctions of $150.00 to the Clerk of the Court, or submit a statement of good cause explaining his failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c). (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/13/11 ORDERING Union Pacific's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for the FEHA Claim (Claim 1), the IIED claim (Claim 2), the constructive termination claim (Claim 3), the assault and battery claim (Cl aim 4), and the NIED claim (Claim 6) is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE.The negligent retention and supervision claim (Claim 5) is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall file her First Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order.(Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.