Sherman v. Sun et al
| Joseph A. Sherman |
| Ting Sun, Dale Janssen and Dan Gonzalez |
| 2:2010cv03120 |
| November 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/28/12 DISREGARDING 7 Motion to Proceed with Service of Summons. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/7/11, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Case referred to Judge Burrell. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 14 days after service of the objections. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/20/10 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed; Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (Williams, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
