Smith v. GMAC Mortgage Co. et al
Samuel Smith |
GMAC Mortgage Co., Paul Martino, Sophia Phendy-Sunny, Samantha Albranski and Jasmine Khun |
2:2010cv03131 |
November 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Alameda |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Morrison C. England |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/15/11 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Objections due within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Duong, D) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/08/11 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed; Plaintiff is GRANTED thirty days from the date of service of this order to file anamended complaint that complies with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice; the amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled Amended Complaint; plaintiff must file an original and two copies of the amended complaint; failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with thisorder will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Williams, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.