Pacific Coast Breaker, Inc., et al., v. Connecticut Electric, Inc., et al.,
| Pacific Coast Breakers, Inc. and PC Systems, Inc. |
| Connecticut Electric, Inc., Rod Forrest and Bruce Dunham |
| 2:2010cv03134 |
| November 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/17/12 ORDERING that CIV S-12-1533, is REASSIGNED to U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and U.S. Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings. The New Case Number is: 2:12-cv-1533 KJM EFB.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/23/2011 ORDERING that Defendant's 14 motion to stay this action is granted and this action is STAYED pending resolution of the Indiana action. The parties are directed to notify this court when the motion to dismiss in that action is decided and, if the action proceeds in Indiana, when the action is resolved. Plaintiffs' 17 motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED without prejudice.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/23/10 DENYING pltf's 6 Ex Parte Motion for TRO. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
