Lopez v. Salinas
| Victor Lopez |
| S.M. Salinas |
| 2:2010cv03168 |
| November 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/22/15 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed April 24, 2015, are adopted in full; This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b); The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/24/15 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/29/11 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed February 23, 2011, are adopted with respect to petitioner's due process claim; Respondent's motion to dismiss 11 is granted with res pect to petitioner's due process claim. Respondent's motion to dismiss petitioner's Ex Post Facto Clause claim is STAYED. Defendant SHALL move to lift the stay in this matter upon final resolution of Gilman v. Brown, 2:05-cv-830. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability. Case stayed. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/22/2011 ORDERING the clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this action; and RECOMMENDING that respondent's 11 motion to dismiss be granted; and ptnr's application for habeas corpus be denied. Assigned and Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/14/10. DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. Petitioner's 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to return to petitioner his $5.00 check submitted with his amended petition. (cc Michael Farrell, Financial) (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/30/2010 ORDERING that ptnr's 2 application to proceed IFP is GRANTED; the petition for writ of hc is DISMISSED w/ leave to file an amended petition w/in 30 days; and the clerk to send ptnr the form to file a hc petition. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lopez v. Salinas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Victor Lopez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: S.M. Salinas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
