Angel Luis Poye v. State of California et al
| Angel Luis Poye |
| State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation, California Medical Facility, Kathleen L. Dickenson, Does, D. Foston, N. Grannis and C. Hall |
| 2:2010cv03221 |
| December 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/9/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff's 15 motion for reconsideration, construed as a Rule 60(b) motion, is DENIED; and plaintiff's inapposite and defective 17 motion to amend the complaint in this closed case, is DISREGARDED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/09/11 ordering this action is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Angel Luis Poye signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/9/2011. CDC is to collect monthly payments and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
