Leskinen v. Halsey et al
| Laura Leskinen |
| Jennifer McHenry, Kelly & Hulme, PC, Joe Nemeth Pinks, Pinks Arbeit Nemeth, LLC, Ken Warner Landstar Title Company, Inc., Carolyn A. Halsey, Barbara Allen, Muriel Murphy, Robert Whitman, Sr., Marketplace Realty, LLC, Douglas Whitman, Robert Whitman , Jr., Mike Carroll and Robert Kelly, Jr. |
| 2:2010cv03363 |
| December 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/26/2011 ORDERING that The October 6, 2011 hearing on the 84 motion to dismiss filed by defendants Robert Kelly and Kelly & Hulme, P.C. is vacated in light of the pending findings and recomme ndations. Plaintiff need not file a written opposition to this motion unless the court sets a briefing schedule in regards to this motion. The October 20, 2011 hearing on the 102 motion to dismiss filed by defendants Michael Carroll and Marketplac e Realty is vacated in light of the pending findings and recommendations. Plaintiff need not file a written opposition to this motion unless the court sets a briefing schedule in regards to this motion. Plaintiff's 105 motion to continue is DENIED as moot. (Duong, D)(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/9/11 RECOMMENDING that 42 Motion to Dismiss for lack of person jurisdiction and/or Improper Venue filed by Pinks, Arbeit & Nemeth, Joe Nemeth be granted and th e Nemeth Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied as moot; RECOMMENDING this action be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York and FURTHER ORDERING the 10/6/11 hearing on docum ent numbers 26-31, 45,55,57,71-72 is VACATED pending resolution of these findings and recommendations by the assigned district judge. If the district judge determines that this action should proceed in the Eastern District of California, the undersigned will set a new hearing date and briefing schedule for the motions to dismiss. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due 14 days after being served. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/25/11 ORDERING that plaintiff's ex parte request for permission to use a table format in part of her written opposition to the Nemeth Defendants' motion to dismiss 82 is DENIED as mo ot. Plaintiff's ex parte request for an order of the court prohibiting any of the defendants from filing any motions during the month of September 2011 80 is DENIED. Plaintiff's ex parte request to continue the hearing on the Nemeth Defen dants' motion to dismiss from 9/8/11, to 9/15/11 80 is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Plaintiff's request that the court continue the 9/15/11 hearing on the motion to dismiss 45 to 9/22/11 is DENIED as moot. The court, on its own motion, continues the 9/15/11 hearing on Warner and Landstar's motion to 10/6/11. Plaintiff shall file a reply to Warner and Landstar's motion to dismiss based on the current hearing date of 10/6/11. Plaintiffs request that the court enter an order providing that the defendants in this case be relieved from serving their respective responsive pleadings or other responses to plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint on the other defendants 43 is DENIED. Plaintiff's request for a court order directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons and Second Amended Complaint on defendants Mike Carroll and Marketplace Realty 79 is DENIED. However, plaintiff shall have an additional 90 days from 9/5/11, to effectuate service on defendants Mike Carroll and Marketplace Realty. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/18/11: 36 Plaintiff's objection to the court's July 7, 2011 order is overruled. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/11 GRANTING IN PART 24 Motion for Extension. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Douglas Whitman shall file a response to plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. No further ex parte requests for extensions of time will be considered unless Whitman complies with this courts Local Rules regarding requests for extensions of time. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/7/2011 ORDERING that the 11 Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 16, 2011 are ADOPTED. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is revoked without prejudice.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/25/11 ORDERING that the REQUEST to Amend First Amended Complaint to Correct Two (2) Business Entity Names 12 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that effectuates Plaintiff's desired amendments and is complete in itself. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/13/11 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be revoked without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/28/2011 ORDERING that Pltf's 5 "objection" is OVERRULED and her request that the undersigned disqualify himself is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/4/11. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff's 3 requests for relief filed on 2/14/11, are DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
