Pacheco v. Paul Financial, LLC et al
Phal S. Pacheco |
Paul Financial, LLC, Premier Capital Mortgage, GMAC Mortgage LLC, Foundation Conveyancing LLC, ETS Services, LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. |
2:2010cv03420 |
December 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
San Joaquin |
John A. Mendez |
Kendall J. Newman |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/11/2011. The hearing for 7 Motion to Dismiss and to Strike Complaint is VACATED. The Court is RECOMMENDING plaintiff's case be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants, Clerk close case and vacate all future dates in this action. Within 14 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/21/11: HEARING as to 7 MOTION to DISMISS RESET for 3/3/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Plaintiff shall file a written opposition to the motion to dismiss, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, on or before February 3, 2011. The Removing Defendants may file a written reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before February 17, 2011. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.