Edwards v. High Desert State Prison et al
Brian Darnell Edwards |
K. Harpes, Raski, T. Barron, Wedemeyer, Cleme, D. Moore, T. Perez, F. Foulk, M. Mitchell, R.L. Gowes, T. Robertson, M. Keating, High Desert State Prison, M. D. McDonald, J. Cheney, J. Turner-Gumbesy and D. Swingle |
2:2010cv03461 |
December 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Kern |
Kendall J. Newman |
William B. Shubb |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/11/13 granting 83 Motion for writ of execution. A writ of execution shall issue in the sum of $665.34, plus necessary levying officer fees pursuant to the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 685.050, be directed to the Sheriff or Marshall of the County of Kings, California. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 75 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/27/13 RECOMMENDING that Defendant Turner-Gamberg be granted summary judgment on plaintiffs strip search claim on the grounds of qualified immunity; Defendants Turner-G amberg, Mitchell, Cheney, and Swingle be granted summary judgment on plaintiffs remaining federal claims; and plaintiffs state law claims be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 69 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/1/2012 DENYING 66 Motion to Appoint Counsel; GRANTING Plaintiff 30 days to (1) file a Statement the he relies on 54 Opposition to 47 Motion for Summary Judgment, (2) a Supplemental Opposition to 47 Motion for Summary Judgment, or (3) a new Opposition to 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Michel, G) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/17/12 AFFIRMING 45 Order denying Motion to Compel. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/6/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 40 and 41 motions to compel. (Yin, K) |
Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/2/12 denying 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/22/2011. Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/16/11 recommending that plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 33 be denied. MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 33 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/28/11 granting 30 Motion to conduct plaintiffs deposition via video conference; Nothing in his order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to btain video conferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/25/2011. Defendant M. D. McDonald is DISMISSED. Defendants' response to First Amended Complaint is due w/in 21 days from date of this Order. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 26 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/19/11 granting 25 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' response to the first amended complaint is due 21 days following the adoption of the instant findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of defendant McDonald. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant McDonald be dismissed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/7/11 VACATING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint; if plaintiff does not file a second amended complaint, the court will again recommend that defendant McDonald be dismissed.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 20 ORDER denying 16 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/05/11. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/4/2011 RECOMMENDING that dft McDonald be dismissed from this action. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/25/2011 ORDERING that claims against dft McDonald are DISMISSED w/ leave to amend w/in 30 days, pltf is not obligated to amend his cmplt; the allegations are sufficient against dfts Turner-Gambe ry, Cheney, Mitchell and Swingle; the clerk to provide pltf forms for service which pltf may complete and return w/in 30 days; pltf to return the Notice of Submission or Amendment w/ response; and pltf's 12 motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Yin, K) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/10/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 8 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED; pltf to pay the $350.00 filing fee w/ an initial partial filing fee in accordance w/ the concurrent CDC order; pltf's cmplt is DISMISSED; w/in 30 days, pltf to complete and return the Notice of Amendment w/ the required documents; and pltf's 2 motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Yin, K) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/4/2011 ORDERING pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; and the clerk to send pltf a new ifp application. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.