United States of America et al v. Black
Petitioner: United States of America and Chung Ngo
Respondent: David W. Black
Case Number: 2:2010mc00064
Filed: June 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATION and ORDER 7 re IRS Tax Summons Enforcement signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/3/2010 is APPROVED. IRS Summons is ENFORCED and respondent, David W. Black, shall appear before Revenue Agent Chung Ngo on 9/14/2010 at 9:00 AM for examination of books, records, etc. until completed. Petitioners may submit Stipulation and Proposed Order requesting Show Cause Hearing be removed from calendar. (Marciel, M)
July 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/2010 DENYING petitioners' 4 Ex Parte Application to shorten time for Show Cause Hearing. (Marciel, M)
June 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/18/10: Respondent is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, at the hearing SET for 8/12/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, why he should not be compe lled to obey the IRS summons issued on 4/15/10. The Court hereby appoints the group manager of the petitioning IRS employee, to serve process in this case. Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 3 or 4 of this order, shall be filed with the Clerk at least 14 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. Respondent may notify the Court, in a writing filed with the Clerk and served on the USA at least 14 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing, that respondent has no objections to enforcement of the summons. Respondent's appearance at the hearing will then be excused.(Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America et al v. Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By: Yoshinori H. T. Himel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chung Ngo
Represented By: Yoshinori H. T. Himel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David W. Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?