Coyle v. McDonald et al
Sean Nicholas Coyle |
M. McDonald, Director CDC and Edmund G. Brown, Jr. |
2:2011cv00016 |
January 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Lassen |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/19/13 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 26 ORDER adopting 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/30/12: The motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust state court remedies 14 is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an amended petition containing only exhausted claims. The motion to stay 19 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/13/12 recommending that the motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust state court remedies 14 be granted with leave to amend. Petitioner should be given 30 days in which to file an amended petition containing only exhaused claims; and the motion to stay 19 be denied. MOTION 14 and 19 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.