Johnson v. Ona
Scott N. Johnson |
Godwin E. Ona |
2:2011cv00021 |
January 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
John F. Moulds |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/13/12 ORDERING 23 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; and defendant's 8/16/11 motion to dismiss is denied. (Matson, R) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/26/12 ORDERING that the Initial Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 2/2/12 to 5/3/2012 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/7/11 RECOMMENDING that defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Muelller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/2011 ORDERING 15 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED; defendant is appearing in propria persona, therefore this matter is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds for all pretrial scheduli ng and proceedings; IT IS ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set, and any initial scheduling orders issued, by the undersigned are VACATED; all future documents shall bear the case number 2:11-cv-0021 KJM JFM (PS); Clerk shall issue an initial scheduling order for JFM. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 15 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/09/11 ORDERING that the parties are to SHOW CAUSE w/i 7 days why they should not be sanctioned for their failure to comply with the courts (#14) Order regarding dispositional documents. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/9/2011 ORDERING that The court GRANTS plaintiff's 10 request at this time; however, the court notes that this is the third extension of time requested in this case ( 6 7 ). The court fu rther notes that there would be no cause for the present request were it not for the 7 second stipulated extension of time, which granted defendant until May 16, 2011 one week after the due date of the joint status conference statement - to file an answer. As plaintiff is frequently before this court, the court trusts that steps will be taken in the future to prevent such self-made scheduling conflicts. (Duong, D) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/2011 7 ORDERING that Defendant Godwin E. Ona shall have until 5/16/2011 to respond to complaint. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Ona | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Scott N. Johnson | |
Represented By: | Scott N. Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Godwin E. Ona | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.