Nelson v. Petterle
| Ester Ellen Nelson |
| Joseph Petterle |
| 2:2011cv00140 |
| January 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
FINDINGS of FACT and CONCLUSIONS of LAW signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/18/11 GRANTING Petitioner's petition for Return of the child under the convention. Respondent shall return the child to Petitioner's physical custody immediately. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/11/11 ORDERING respondent to file a redacted copy of Exhibit 1 to 1 Notice of Removal by no later than 3/14/11. The Clerk of Court shall SEAL the originial exhibit 1 to the Notice of Removal. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/10/2011 ORDERING the Clerk's Office to REDACT page 8 of the 15 Response to Order to Show Cause under Local Rule 140(a) to protect the individual's privacy. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re: Summary Judgment signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/9/2011 ORDERING that petitioner shall show cause in writing to be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on 3/11/2011, why judgment should not be issued in favor of Responden t as a matter of law on her "Verified Petition for Return of Child" since neither party has briefed the issue of Petitioner's right to custody under Iceland law. Petitioner must prove the Respondent's retention of their child was in breach of her rights of custody. Any responsive filing shall be filed no later than 12:00 p.m. on 3/14/2011. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/3/11 ORDERING that counsel shall communicate with each other concerning how this case should be fully scheduled, including a date by which discovery shall be completed, the last hearing date for law a nd motion, and the date on which trial shall commence. Counsels agreement concerning the schedule shall be filed in a joint document due no later than 4:00 p.m. on February 11, 2011. If counsel cannot agree, each party shall file a separate proposed schedule by the above referenced date and time, and an explanation why agreement could not be reached. Status Conference set for 2/14/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nelson v. Petterle | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ester Ellen Nelson | |
| Represented By: | John Eric Blair Myers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Joseph Petterle | |
| Represented By: | James P. Chandler |
| Represented By: | Sean Patrick Gjerde |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
