Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Roger Hicks |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2011cv00148 |
| January 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| John A. Mendez |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/23/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment 21 is DENIED, The Commissioner's Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment 24 is GRANTED, and Judgment in entered for the Commissioner. Given the satisfactory showing made in the Declaration of Bess M. Brewer 20 , the 1/25/12 order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution is discharged. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/12/12 ORDERING that defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 days to respond to Paintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment up to and including 4/11/2012. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/25/12 ORDERING within fourteen days of the filed date of this order, plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, and shall file his summary judgment motion. Failure to timely file the required writings will result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/15/11 APPROVING and ORDERING extension for Plaintiff to file his summary judgment to January13, 2012. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/14/2011 re: 15 Stipulation and Proposed Order; ORDERING plaintiff's time to file his Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby EXTENDED to 12/13/2011. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/2/11 ADOPTING 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; and DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP.. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/22/11: ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court assign this case to a District Judge. RECOMMENDING that 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS be DENIED. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. [case assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez] (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roger Hicks | |
| Represented By: | Bess M. Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
