Rodas v. Creditors Specialty Service, Inc.
| Victor Rodas |
| Creditors Specialty Service, Inc. and Charles Stanley |
| 2:2011cv00209 |
| January 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yolo |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| John A. Mendez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/18/14: Plaintiff's 68 MOTION to Show Cause is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as having been rendered moot by defendant's untimely production of post-judgment discovery responses; plaintiff 's 68 Motion to Show Cause is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to plaintiff filing a motion to compel further responses based on defendant's inadequate or incomplete discovery responses, as well as without prejudice to plaintiff filing a motion f or sanctions, brought separately or in conjunction with a motion to compel, based on defendant's failure to timely produce discovery responses pursuant to 67 Order; and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and/or for sanctions may be heard on shortened time and, if the parties cannot agree to a date for the hearing of plaintiff's motion to compel, plaintiff may file an ex parte request for an order shortening time. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/13/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff's unopposed 63 motion to compel post-judgment discovery pursuant to the 66 judgment entered on 1/10/2014 is GRANTED. Defendant Creditors Specialty Service, Inc., shall respond to plaintiff's post-judgment discovery requests within fourteen days of the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 57 Motion to Enforce Settlement or in the Alternative to Compel Responses to Post-Judgment Discovery signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/2/13. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/12 DENYING AS UNTIMELY 32 Amended Motion to Compel. The Motion is DROPPED from the court's 7/6/12 law and motion calendar. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/27/2012 GRANTING 28 Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order. Discovery Cutoff: 6/22/2012; Dispositive Motion filing: 8/8/2012; Dispositive Motion Hearing: 9/5/2012 at 9:30 AM; Joint Pretrial Statement due: 10/3/2012; Pretrial Conference RESET for 10/10/2012 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez; Jury Trial RESET for 11/26/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/6/11 ORDERING that the Plaintiff's counsel's request to appear telephonically at the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint on 9/21/11, is hereby granted. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
