Shah v. Employment Development Department
Plaintiff: Fernando - Shah
Defendant: Employment Development Department
Case Number: 2:2011cv00318
Filed: February 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Luis Obispo
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/25/2012 VACATING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 7/11/2012; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice and that the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. 41(b) & L.R. 110. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections within 14 days. (Michel, G)
May 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/8/12 ORDERING that on or before 5/21/12, plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or for failure to comply with court orders. Also on or before 5/21/12, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, as provided in the 2/23 and 4/6 orders. Failure of plaintiff to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or for failure to comply with court orders. Defendants shall file a response to plaintiffs amended complaint within 14 days from the date an amended complaint is filed. (Meuleman, A)
April 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/6/2012 STRIKING the 22 First Amended Complaint, Amended Complaint due by 4/30/2012, Response due 14 days after the Amended Complaint is filed; DENYING 23 Motion to Dismiss as moot; VACATING the Motion Hearing as to 23 Motion to Dismiss; CONTINUING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference until 7/11/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Status Reports due by 6/27/2012. (Michel, G)
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2012 GRANTING 9 Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend, Amended Complaint due within 30 days; DENYING 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel; CONTINUING Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference until 5/16/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Status Report due by 5/2/2012. (Michel, G)
August 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/26/11 ORDERING that the 10 08/01/11 OSC is DISCHARGED; the hearing on the 9 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 10/19/11 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; plf shall file an opposition or non-opposition by 10/15/11; dft may file a reply by 10/12/11. (Benson, A.)
August 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/1/11 ORDERING the plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 8/24/11, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opp osition to the pending motion. Opposition or statement of non-opposition due no later than 8/24/11. Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 8/31/11. Status Conference currently scheduled for 9/14/11 is CONTINUE D to 12/21/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. HEARING on defendant's 9 MOTION to DISMISS is CONTINUED to 9/7/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Donati, J)
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/5/2011 GRANTING plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis but DENYING his 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice. Clerk directed to send Mr. Shah 1 Summons, 2 USM -285 forms, an instruction sheet, a copy of the 1 Complaint, the Court's Scheduling Order, and new case documents. US Marshal shall serve process and plaintiff shall supply them, w/in 14 days from filed date of Order, all documents needed to serve process. Plaintiff shall file, w/in 14 days, a Statement with Court that said documents have been submitted to USMS. (cc: US Marshal Service) (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shah v. Employment Development Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando - Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Employment Development Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?