United States of America v. Approximately $20,000.00 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $20,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
2:2011cv00320 |
February 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Frank C. Damrell |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/20/11. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 7/18/2011 ORDERING 24 dispositional documents are to be filed on or before 8/8/2011. All dates/hearings set in this matter, to include any pending motions, are hereby VACATED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/9/2011 ORDERING that the 20 Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 16, 2011, are ADOPTED. The clerk's 15 entry of default as against Ms. McClellan, be set aside in the case bearing th e number 2:11-cv-00320-FCD-KJN. The setting aside of Ms. McClellan's entry of default in this case shall not alter the various clerk's entries of default in the two related cases bearing the numbers 2:11-cv-091-FCD-KJN and 2:11-cv-099-FCD-KJN, respectively. The responsive pleadings submitted to the court on behalf of real party in interest Ms. McClellan on May 9, 2011, be filed by the Clerk. (Duong, D) |
Filing 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/13/2011 RECOMMENDING that 15 the clerk's entry of default as against Ms. McClellan, be set aside in the case bearing the number 2:11-cv-00320-FCD-KJN. The setting aside of Ms. McClellan's entry of default in this case shall not alter the various clerk's entries of default in the two related cases bearing the numbers 2:11-cv-091-FCD-KJN and 2:11-cv-099-FCD-KJN, respectively; Referred to Judge Frank C. Danrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR PUBLICATION signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/9/11. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 2/4/11: This action is reassigned to District Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as: CIV. S-11-0320 FCD KJN. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $20,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | David Taylor Shelledy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Approximately $20,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.