Olague v. County of Sacramento et al
| Cassandra C Olague |
| County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, County of Sacramento Child Protective Services, Roger Dickinson, Jimmie Yee, Susan Peters, Roberta MacGlashan, Don Nottli, Kenneth Davis, Tracy Davis, Cheryl Bouressa, Robert Kitay, Christina Meza and Richardo Guzman |
| 2:2011cv00331 |
| February 4, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/13/13 ORDERING that 56 Order to Show Cause be DISCHARGED and RECOMMENDING that 51 MOTION to DISMISS be granted; and 47 First Amended Complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend; and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/29/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 54 additional copy of her first amended complaint is stricken. The hearing on defendants' 51 Motion to Dismiss is CONTIN UED to 12/12/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 11/28/2012, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a stat ement of non-opposition to the pending motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non- opposition thereto, no later than 11/28/2012. Failure of plaintiff to file an opposition to the motion will be deemed a statement of non-opposition thereto, and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Defendants may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 12/5/2012. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER adopting 46 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/20/12. Defendant Robert Kitay's 26 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Defendants Cheryl Bouressa, County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Child Prot ective Services, Roger Dickinson, Roberta MacGlashan, Don Nottli, Susan Peters, Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, and Jimmie Yee's 30 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's entire complaint is dismissed (against all defenda nts) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in a recommendation of dismissal by the magistrate judge. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/21/2012 VACATING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 11/14/2012; RECOMMENDING that 26 , 30 Motions to Dismiss be granted; RECOMMENDING that Pl aintiff's entire 1 Complaint be dismissed, as to all defendants, pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. 12(b)(6); RECOMMENDING that the Plaintiff be provided 30 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations to file an Amended Complaint. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/28/11 ORDERING hearings on 26 MOTION to DISMISS filed by Robert Kitay, and 30 MOTION to DISMISS filed by County of Sacramento, et al, CONTINUED to 2/8/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 1/25/12, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to one of the pending motions. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to that motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 1/25/12. Failure of plaintiff to file an opposition will be deemed a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion, a nd may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and/or for failure to comply with court orders and this courts Local Rules. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 4/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The parties shall file status reports, as provided in the 7/7/11 and 11/24/11 orders, on or before 4/4/12. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/15/11; Within 14 days from the date of service of this order, defendant Robert Kitay shall pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $65.20, unless within that time Kitay files a written statement showing good cause for failing to waive service. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal, 501 "I" Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 (tel. 916-930-2030). (cc USM)(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/6/11 GRANTING 4 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to issue forthwith all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Plaintiff shall supply the U.S. Marshal, wi thin 14 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal shall serve process, with copies of this court's scheduling order and related documents, within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiffs; and shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been served. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (cc:USM). (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/5/2011. Plaintiff directed to file, w/in 14 days of this Order, a further Affidavit containing required information re plaintiff's employment income and any other income received w/in past 12 months. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
