Faulkner v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company et al
| Mary Beth Faulkner |
| Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company and PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP Group Long-Term Disability Plan |
| 2:2011cv00408 |
| February 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/8/12 GRANTING 50 Motion for Continuance of Hearing; The hearing as to 47 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES is reset for 7/9/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/15/2012 GRANTING 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; AWARDING Plaintiff with retroactive benefits and reinstatement of benefits; DENYING 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/10/12; Pending before the court in the above captioned case are cross-motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 20 and 25, which are currently set to be heard on January 17, 2012. Due to court congestion, the court CONTINUES the hearing to January 30, 2012 at 10:00a.m. The deadline for the filing of reply briefs, if any, is unchanged. (Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
