Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center et al v. Grantham et al
| Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Environmental Protection Information Center, Klamath Forest Alliance, Wildlands CPR and Wilderness Society |
| Patricia A. Grantham and United States Forest Service |
| 2:2011cv00439 |
| February 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| Morrison C. England |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/28/12 GRANTING Defendants' 28 Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety and DENYING Plaintiffs' 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/14/11 ORDERING that the Defendants will file their combined responsive papers and cross-Motion by 10/21/2011. Plaintiffs will file their reply Memorandum by 11/25/2011. Defendants will file their reply Memorandum by 12/30/2011. The Hearing on the parties' Cross-Motions 24 is CONTINUED to 1/12/2012 at 02:00 PM.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/8/11: Federal Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before 5/17/11.(Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
