Argueta v. JP Morgan Chase et al
Plaintiff: Cecilia Argueta
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Case Number: 2:2011cv00441
Filed: February 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/7/12 ORDERING that Defendants' joint MOTION TO DISMISS the third Amended Complaint as to J.P. Morgan Chase and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 51 is GRANTED, and it is further ordered that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to defendants J.P. Morgan Chase and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/30/11 ORDERING that J.P. Morgan Chase and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in its entirety be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; If plaintiff wishes to amend the SAC to cure the defects in the five causes of action, she may do so within twenty days from the date of this Order. (Becknal, R)
November 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/22/2011 ORDERING that the defendants' 42 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's 38 Second Amended Complaint will be taken under submission without oral argument. (Michel, G)
November 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING 43 Defendants' Request to appear telephonically at Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/14/11.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/4/11: Discovery due by 10/17/2011. Dispositive Motions filed by 3/12/2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/14/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. Bench Trial set for 7/17/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
October 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/29/11 ORDERING that defendants' Motion for Judgment 37 be, and the same hereby, is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
September 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 09/06/11 ORDERING that plf's 31 Motion to Amend the Complaint is GRANTED; the Second Amended Complaint shall be filed w/i 10 days. (Benson, A.)
July 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/19/11: Plaintiff's shall have an additional week to file her Second Amended Complaint, which shall be due to be filed on July 28, 2011. (Kaminski, H)
June 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/30/11, ORDERING that J.P. Morgan Chase and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation's 13 motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff is GRANTED 20 days from the date of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
June 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/24/2011 GRANTING Dfts 17 request to appear telephonically at the motion hearing set for 7/5/2011 at 2:00 PM. (Zignago, K.)
April 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/11/2011. J.P. Morgan Chase's and Federal Home Loan Mortgage's 4 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to plaintiff's claim of CA Civil Code Section 2923.5 violations and GRANTED in all other respects. If plaintiff wishes to amend Complaint to cure defects in other 8 Causes of Action, she may do so w/in 20 days from date of Order. (Marciel, M)
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/31/11 ORDERING that Defendants' 5 request to appear telephonically at Defendants' Motion to Dismiss scheduled for April 11, 2010 at 2:00 is GRANTED. (Duong, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Argueta v. JP Morgan Chase et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase
Represented By: Rachel Suzanne Opatik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Rachel Suzanne Opatik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quality Loan Service Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cecilia Argueta
Represented By: Swazi Elkanzi Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?