Carlon et al v. Taylor, Bean and Whitaker Mortgage Corporation, et al
| Julia M. Carlon and Christine M. Carlon |
| Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Taylor, Bean and Whitaker Mortgage Corporation and Central Loan Administration and Reporting |
| 2:2011cv00499 |
| February 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| John A. Mendez |
| Foreclosure |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of CA, County of Sacramento signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/4/11. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/27/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for an order for Publication of Summons 18 is DENIED and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Taylor, Bean and Whitaker Mortgage Company are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/11/2011 ORDERING Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing, not to exceed 5 pages, why this action should not be dismissed as to Defendant Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Company for pltfs' failure to timely serve Defendant; pltfs' response to this Court's order should be filed no later than 5:00 PM on 7/22/2011. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
